Platform Extensions · Apex and LWC built to survive real data volumes

Salesforce development that holds up at production data volumes.

Custom Salesforce development — Apex, Lightning Web Components, integrations and AppExchange packages built to governor limits and real bulk patterns.

Delivered from our Chennai and Bengaluru studios — to clients across India and overseas.

// The problem

It worked in the demo. Then a data load hit two hundred records.

Salesforce customisations rarely fail at the point they are built. They fail three months later — when a bulk import trips a governor limit, when a trigger cascades in a way nobody modelled, or when a consultant's work collides with a sharing model that was never fully documented.

By then the org has accumulated several people's customisations, minimal test coverage, and a general reluctance to change anything. The platform is capable; the implementation has become fragile.

Does any of this sound familiar?

Failures on bulk operations Code that handles one record cleanly and fails on a data load.
Nobody wants to touch it Test coverage that exists to satisfy deployment, not to catch regressions.
Triggers with unpredictable effects Cascading automation nobody has mapped end to end.
Integrations that fail silently One-way calls with no retry, no error handling, and no reconciliation.

What it costs to leave this alone

A fragile Salesforce org taxes every future change. Work that should take days takes weeks because nobody is confident what will break — and the fear compounds as more customisation lands on top.

// How we fix it

Our approach to Salesforce Extension Development

We build to bulk patterns and governor limits from the first line, because retrofitting that is far more expensive than doing it correctly. Lightning Web Components that perform, integrations with retry and reconciliation, and customisations that respect your sharing model rather than working around it.

Test coverage exercises real scenarios and bulk conditions rather than hitting a percentage. That is what makes the next change safe — and it is the difference between an org you can develop and one you are afraid of.

Talk to us about your project

// What changes

The return, in plain terms

What you should expect to be different once this is in place.

Bulk-safe

By construction

Written to governor limits and bulk patterns, so data loads do not break it.

Testable

Real coverage

Tests exercising genuine scenarios, so future changes are safe rather than frightening.

Auditable

Sharing respected

Customisation that works with your security model, not around it.

// What's included

Everything in Salesforce Extension Development

Apex built for bulk

Triggers and classes written to bulk patterns and governor limits — not code that works on one record and fails on two hundred.

Lightning Web Components

Modern, performant custom UI matching Salesforce design conventions and behaving properly on mobile.

Integration engineering

REST and platform-event integrations with retry logic, error handling and reconciliation rather than optimistic one-way calls.

Sharing and security model

Customisations that respect your sharing rules and field-level security rather than working around them.

Test coverage that means something

Tests exercising real scenarios and bulk conditions, not the minimum needed to deploy.

AppExchange packaging

Security review preparation and packaging if you intend to distribute commercially.

// Who this is for

Is this you?

Companies with a fragile Salesforce org

Where changes are avoided because nobody knows what will break.

Teams hitting governor limits

Failures appearing at production data volumes.

ISVs building for AppExchange

Needing to pass security review first time.

// Problems we've solved

From challenge to result

Representative engagements, described in terms of what changed for the business.

The challenge

Nightly data loads failed intermittently, and nobody could reliably reproduce the error.

What we did

Audited the trigger framework, rewrote the logic to bulk patterns, and added tests covering bulk and mixed-DML scenarios.

The result

The loads ran cleanly, and the failure mode became reproducible in tests rather than discovered in production.

The challenge

An integration silently dropped records when the external system was briefly unavailable.

What we did

Rebuilt it with queued retries, error surfacing and a reconciliation report comparing both sides.

The result

Failures became visible and recoverable rather than discovered during a quarterly audit.

// Technology

The stack we reach for

Chosen for durability and fit — and handed over as documented code you own outright.

Apex Lightning Web Components SOQL Platform Events REST API Salesforce DX JavaScript

// Questions

Salesforce Extension Development — FAQs

Almost always governor limits and non-bulkified code. Logic written to handle one record at a time fails when a data load processes two hundred. Writing to bulk patterns from the start costs no more and prevents the entire class of failure.
Yes — auditing and remediating inherited orgs is a common engagement. We assess triggers, flows and customisations, identify what is causing failures, and stabilise before adding anything new.
Both, and choosing correctly matters. Flow is right for a great deal of automation and is maintainable by admins. Apex is warranted for complex logic, bulk processing and integrations. Using Apex where Flow would do makes your org harder to maintain.
Yes. The review is thorough and rejects on specific, predictable grounds — CRUD/FLS enforcement, SOQL injection, sharing violations. Designing against it from the start is far cheaper than remediating afterwards.

// Read before you commit

Guides that answer the next question

Honest, detailed writing on costs, trade-offs and how to choose — including when not to hire us.

// Explore more

Other things we engineer

Most clients start with one service and grow into others. One team owns the whole stack.

// Start a project

Have an idea?
Let's engineer it into reality.

Free consultation. Honest scoping. A fixed quote within 48 hours.